Extra Pounds Equal Extra Dollars

Implanting calves can help producers get an additional 19 pounds in weaning weight.

NEW YORK — June 24, 2010 — Maximizing returns is a goal for every producer, no matter what stage of production. For cow/calf producers, implanting calves is one of the most profitable tools available — returning far more in weight gain and feed efficiency than the cost of the implant itself.1

“Implanting works well in practically all stages of beef cattle production and in all sizes of operations,” says Gary Sides, Ph.D., Pfizer Animal Health Veterinary Operations. “In a cow/calf operation, we know that, on average, producers can realize 19 pounds more weaning weight than non-implanted calves. That’s one extra calf for every 25 calves implanted.2 Any producer watching their bottom line can tell you what that means in dollars. Implants are one of the most profitable tools cow/calf producers have available.”1

Dr. Sides notes that cow/calf producers can benefit from implants, even if decisions on which heifers to keep as replacements have not been determined at the time of implanting. Research has shown that a suckling calf implant administered to heifers between two and three months of age has little effect on reproductive performance as long as nutrition is adequate.3

If producers don’t know which heifers they intend to keep, consider implanting all calves at 45 days to 3 months of age to realize improved weaning weights. Dr. Sides notes that producers should make sure that the implant they use is approved for calves at this stage of production. For example, SYNOVEX® C implants are approved for use in calves up to 400 pounds.4

For producers retaining ownership of their calves through the feedlot and focusing on quality grade, implanting can be a beneficial decision. Research has shown that calves implanted with SYNOVEX C during the suckling phase had similar performance and quality grade than non-implanted calves.

Proper implanting goes hand in hand with other good management practices like adequate nutrition and deworming. In fact, one study showed that combining deworming, implanting and a good fly control program can contribute up to $225 a head.1

When deworming, Dr. Sides notes that producers should consider broad-spectrum dewormers that are suitable for calves at the age and weight of implanting. In addition, he recommends that cow/calf producers that want to get the most benefit from implanting evaluate their nutritional program and supplement as needed based on pasture conditions and on cow body condition.

“Some producers may think of implants as something that’s only going to benefit cattle in a stocker or feedlot setting,” Dr. Sides says. “The truth is, any producer who wants to improve weaning weight can benefit from implanting calves.”

Pfizer Animal Health, a business of Pfizer Inc., is a world leader in discovering and developing innovative animal prescription medicines and vaccines, investing an estimated $300 million annually. Beyond the U.S., Pfizer Animal Health also supports veterinarians and their customers in more than 60 countries around the world. For more information on how Pfizer works to ensure a safe, sustainable global food supply with healthy livestock and poultry, or how Pfizer helps companion animals and horses to live longer, healthier lives, visit www.pfizerah.com.

You can still get free marketing insights!

Missed our USDA Report marketing seminar? View it on demand and benefit from the insights and analysis that will help your bottom line.

How USDA Report Will Impact Crop Prices
And Your Bottom Line

Check it out now

Search 3.8+ million listings

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×