Addressing The Emotion Of Animal Welfare

What is in this article?:

Animal activists are successfully influencing the consumer's view of animal welfare by appealing to the core values people believe in, such as compassion, justice, fairness and freedom.

During a recent meeting in Nebraska, a slide depicted two photos. One was of caged laying hens, and the other was a small cage containing two parrots. The message was obvious – why do so many of the public oppose the housing situation for the laying hens, but see no problem with the quality of life of the parrots?

Candace Croney, a Purdue University associate professor of animal behavior and well-being, recently addressed Nebraska producers about the role of ethics in current farm animal welfare debates.

“Looking at these two photos, many people see no problem with the level of inconsistency in their thought process,” she says. “People don't like to look at what they're doing in their own backyard. It's much easier to tell someone else how they should be doing things. When we think about animal welfare, everyone has a different idea of what that means.”

Livestock producers and consumers agree they want food that's safe, palatable, affordable and accessible. However, some consumers question the methods by which their food is produced. As a result, a gap is forming between rural and urban dwellers regarding animal welfare and its regulation.

BEEF Daily Blog: Is It Animal Rights or Animal Welfare? For Me, It's Animal Care

Animal welfare isn't top of mind to most consumers, Croney says. “However, when negative things happen, or you have a negative story in the media regarding animal welfare, people's attention is quickly drawn to the issue.

"Everyone agrees it's our moral obligation to do right for the animals under our care,” Croney continues. “But, what does it mean to 'do right' by our animals? This is a big debate that animal rights activists have tapped into with the public, trying to force them to form an opinion on these issues. They're also using their influence to impact policy regarding animal welfare.”

Animal welfare has different definitions to different people. For many, particularly producers, it's providing good animal husbandry, and taking care of the physical needs of animals for food, water and shelter. However, others feel the biological and behavioral needs of the animal should also be considered.

Closer Look: Animal Science Or Animal Emotionalism?

Animal activists are successfully influencing the consumer's view of animal welfare by appealing to the core values people believe in, such as compassion, justice, fairness and freedom, she adds. Activists also highlight issues easily grasped by consumers, like housing, handling and pain; they then develop modest appeals for change by adopting a high moral ground or even using religion.

As an example, Croney points to farrowing crates to contain sows. “The activists say, 'Can't we give this pig just a little more room to turn around?' That sounds completely reasonable, but the urban consumer doesn't understand how a sow behaves. They don't understand it's not that easy. Their opinion is 'What's the problem? Just do it.'”

With a vast majority of U.S. consumers far removed from agricultural production, their main contact with animals is via pets, zoos and mass media. “More people are thinking about animals in human terms. We don't see animal welfare conversations happening in developing countries where people are still struggling to put food on the table. In the U.S., the way many people think about their companion animals starts to color how they think food animals should be treated,” she says.

Discuss this Article 27

Janet Weeks V (not verified)
on Aug 22, 2012

Animal agriculture needs to do a better job reaching consumers by not insulting their intelligence or their values. Animal agriculture also needs to consider that plant foods are better, cleaner, safer, healthier, kinder, and far more Earth-responsible ways to feed the world's hungry. With global warming a mounting issue, drought taking its toll on Earth's dwindling resources, rampant abuses taking place in factory farms and slaughterhouses across the US--it's high time to give animal agriculture a rest and move to raising crops for people to eat--not to feed billions of animals. Grow berries, not dairies. Get with the program now, before it's too late.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

Well said.

Vickie (not verified)
on Aug 25, 2012

Janet, although I agree with most of your sentiments, I have to add that I am a meat eater, and a small time farmer. I do care about animal welfare, and I want to give my animals the best quality of life while they have their lives. I know too many industrial farmers throw aside consumer comments with "They don't know animals" or "Just a bunch of peta loonies and vegetarians". Sorry boys, I eat beef, lamb, chicken and pork, that I grow or buy from small local farms where I can see how they are raised.. Don't think you can be profitable? Look at Polyface farms, setting the bar for farm animal husbandry. Oh, and we do not feed the world with beef and pork, but with soy, corn and wheat, no abuse issues there. Just a meat eater's two cents.

Amanda Katz (not verified)
on Aug 22, 2012

I have no problem with egg farmers, pig farmers, dairy farmers, etc. telling their story. But if you want the story to resonate with the public, it's got to be the right one. The public is not stupid. Sorry, but making excuses for unnecessary and painful practices such as battery cages, gestation (not farrowing) crates, tail docking, beak trimming, etc. - that doesn't pass the sniff test. Consumers are never going to buy into that, no matter how the story is told. What is the problem with simply improving animal welfare practices? Gestation crates and battery cages are NOT needed to produce a lot of food or make a profit. These intensive farming practices are bad not just for animal welfare, but also human health and the environment. Why not let the animals be animals?? Let chickens peck and the ground and pigs root through the soil as God intended, and they were evolved over millions of years to do. That is a story the public will buy -- and they are buying it. Farmers with high welfare make more money because their product is in such high demand. If you keep trying to sell CAFOs, you will be left in the dust.

Marla M. (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

It is not possible to feed the world with chickens and pigs running around. There is not rampant abuse across our country. There are a couple of overly sensationalized videos by radical groups. The public is not stupid at all, however, they are not educated in animal agriculture either. This article begins to address the issue, emotion versus facts. Continue your research but look adequately at both sides.

Albion (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

Dear - so you call the most recent (and just as an example" footage obtained by COK "overly sensationalized videos by radical groups"? Interesting statement. My dear girl, let me assure you that there really is NO need to "overly sensationalize" anything. And "radical" groups? What, pray, do you mean by that exactly? Is it radical to you to provide the consuming public with the information about how the product they pay for is produced? Surely not. You read the word "radical" (pertaining to animal welfare) in a publication somewhere, and liked it. You are repeating something you do not understand. That is a great shame - because "we" welcome informed discussion. But clearly that is not for you.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Dec 14, 2012

Feed the world? Such a ridiculous cliche and justification for ILOs. Biodiversity, farming justice, clean water--that's what agriculture should be about, not this constant propaganda about "feeding the world".
.

mollycoddle
on Dec 15, 2012

Good idea, "anonymous." Are you volunteering not to eat? If not, how do you propose we decide who gets to eat and who doesn't. Feeding the world ain't gonna happen with farmers markets. gonna

Anonymous (not verified)
on Aug 26, 2012

The public is not stupid!?! Give me a break. The public swallows PeTA lies, how stupid is that? And as far as the hens in cages vs. parrots in cages--PeTA wants to outlaw parrots in cages too.

Albion (not verified)
on Aug 23, 2012

I think, Gentlemen, all the argumentation used by you in your article goes pretty much out the window when people get to see what has happened, up to very recently, at Central Valley Meat Co. in Hanford, Calif. (COK investigation); video to be enjoyed at YouTube. Sure ... people ought not to see these things, you say (and sure enough, legislation does now exist to make entering such a facility and filming illegal. Wonder why ..), or else they get all "emotional". This has nothing to do with emotion, but with the bare fact if such abuse were visitited on Humans we'd all be aghast at so much monstrosity. But they are only animals, right? Meat on legs. They are not, let me assure you. They are as aware and as sentient as you and me. They have to same right to life and protection from abuse and murder as you and me. Sorry. But there it is. This is not about larger cages, longer chains, successful stunning, etc. It is about .. do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

There will always be a bad apple in any industry. Do you think all men should be castrated because of a few rapists?

Albion (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

Hm - perhaps not. But let's face it: this same logic is applied to animals all the time without anyone thinking it wrong. So - either do it across the board or do not do it at all. As said, do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself. Fairly easy to understand, surely. As is, "Do not kill".

Karen (not verified)
on Sep 21, 2012

Yes!! Here, here!

Chuck Huseman (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

Please provide me with all of the abundant and affordable food that I could ever want. Then make it even more affordable (cheaper) and make it available absolutely anywhere I may wish to find it. Once you have spent years of effort and countless millions reaching these goals better than anywhere in the world, let ME tell you how it should really be done. After all, I have a BA degree from Silly State Consumers College.

In the know (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

I grew up on your typical small 40 cow dairy with 30 sows in farrowing crates. My grandparents had 24 cows and a small hen house. Note that we chopped the heads off these chickens and butchered them at the farm, as they don't live forever. While that lifestyle provided a good living 30 or more years ago, it is not a profitable business model today. In fact, it wasn't then, as my dad sold his pigs in 1980 when the business became unprofitable. Larger farms are more efficient, productive and profitable. They are here to stay. In 2000 10% of or milk came from dairies with 2,000 or more cows; in 2010 33% came from the large herds and by 2020 it will be over 50% and likely 70%. Assuming all big farms are bad is a poor assumption and stereotype. There well run large and small farms. There are also poorly run large and small farms. The poor operations continue to go out of business as they can't compete in commodity driven market. Another point is that we will never feed a growing global population on lettuce and berries alone. People need to get hungry, see food prices get in line with inflation and get a wake up call.

Fred (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

i see that someone has alerted the HSUS/PETA letter-writing employees that it's time to educate and enlighten the readers of Beef. Please stick to the east and west coast papers, where the falsehoods you profess are more likely to be accepted by people who don't take care of animals every day, or ever, for that matter. Your radical views (without the facts and science to back them up) won't sway anyone here.

Bea Elliott (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

Using the word "care" in animal production just seem disingenuous - You may monitor millions of beings for their measurement in productivity... But "care" is restricted to that only. And that meaning that also implies "fondness" is shown to be hollow when the true (money) motives are realized.

The "care" that a rancher may have is quickly lost once those beings serve their allotted time. Does anyone think that one of the previous "owners" of these dairy cows at Central Valley had any regrets of "dumping" the cow off there? Of course not - The money changed hands... Getting #4898 to the kill floor is someone else's problem!

And pigs or chickens are just the same - Thought of as units and meat bags. From the beginning and in the end - they're only good for one thing... How much money gets passed in the process is the flip side of the "care" coin.

As Janet Weeks said... All of this is entirely unnecessary and wasteful. Hazardous to a progressive, sustainable and compassionate future. I hear quinoa and amaranth are some of the most drought hardy, insect resistant, high protein grains there are to grow... Something to mull on while looking at red-ink and a disappearing consumer base.

HelloReality (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

Dear Fred,
Those "east and west coast ... people who don't take care of animals every day, or ever, for that matter."...?

They're the people BUYING what farmers produce. You ignore what THEY want, and YOU go out of business. Treat them with contempt, and they WILL stop buying your "product".

#BasicBusiness101

also

#ReadItAndWeep

Jim (not verified)
on Sep 3, 2012

#101 Three of five human basic needs Food, Water, Shelter
Food is a commodity and priced as such based on supply and demand. What people want is: F-food
A-affordable
R- resource for
M-mankind's
E-energy
R-requirement

Mary Finelli
on Aug 24, 2012

Fred, the majority of people who read this article may be closed minded, as you imply. However, the conditions and treatment to which farmed animals are routinely subjected is inhumane and unjustifiable. That is apparent to any reasonable person, and the public is increasingly realizing it. Industry can spin it however it wants, and try to conceal as is being attempted, but the truth speaks for itself. There's no denying it.

Fred (not verified)
on Sep 4, 2012

That is your OPINION. I, too, have an opinion. Mine is based on 51 years of living with and around animals that I OWN. I'm sure that the word own ruffles many feathers, however, legally, they are my property and I am responsible for their well-being. I am so tired of people who do not know me or anything about my farm ,
assume that they know I'm a bad steward of my land, animals... This is still a free country and it is governed by laws. Laws are commonly accepted guidelines by which most people abide for an orderly society. These laws have been based on either science or accepted practices/behavior, not by whims and feelings. I do not represent "industry" (apparently the boogeyman to you) and I'm not spinning anything. These are the facts, in my life. I love animals and do a pretty good job taking care of them. You may not want to agree, but I know dfferently.

Jim (not verified)
on Aug 24, 2012

F - food
A - affordable
R - resource for
M - mankind's
E - energy
R - requirement

Jonathan gilbert (not verified)
on Aug 25, 2012

Actually Fred, the current science supports humane treatment of farmed animals. Try reading Prof. McGlone of Texas Tech, who is considered Americas foremost expert on swine farming. His research paper on swine farming from an welfare and productivity perspective supports non-intensive confinement. Secondly, have you warned Smithfield that they have got it wrong? Have you warned them that by converting to penned housing, the world will starve? Have you warned all the retailers that have deserted those suppliers that support intensive confinemet, that their businesses will no longer exist?? Oh, All Knowing Fred, please tell us you came down from the mountain tops with the 2 Tablets Of Fred. Please tell us your are The Saviour! Hee hee, your abusive abd cruel world is crumbling, and there is not a damn thing you can do about it. Maybe you can sell buggy whips!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Aug 25, 2012

Humans simply do not need to be eating other animals, or their products. Been vegan for 35 yrs and still alive.

Karin (not verified)
on Aug 26, 2012

Just because you have been vegan for so many years doesn't mean you have to expect everyone else to be the same way!!

james (not verified)
on Aug 26, 2012

How come PETA doesn't shut down the Muslims with the way they Slaughter animals.

Chris Ahmed (not verified)
on Sep 6, 2012

It is deplorable that animal agriculture exists in this world. The forced enslavement and destruction of sentient creatures. It is heartless, cruel and unsustainable.

More and more consumers are becoming aware of this. Meat consumption and demand is growing less and less. Farms are shutting down. People are embracing plant foods. It's a revolution.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your BEEF Magazine ID
(optional)

BEEF Newsletter Sign Up

Search 2.5+ million listings