Cow/calf production is an annual series of cycles that draws producer attention to particular traits at certain times of the year.
Calving season brings the reality of our sire selection for birth weight, calving ease and calf vigor.
Breeding season focuses our attention on reproduction and fertility traits.
Weaning season draws our attention to the pounds produced/cow.
At harvest time, we find out how well our mating decisions panned out for feedlot gain and carcass performance.
At each of these stages, we're reminded how difficult it can be to make mating decisions that accomplish our goals in each production area.
For instance, with calving season upon us in much of the industry, birth weight and calving ease take center stage as cow/calf operators try to maximize the percentage of their calf crops. But, looking ahead to this year's breeding decisions for these traits, keep in mind that aiming for birth weights that contribute to calving ease is more complex than just selecting bulls with low birth weight expected progeny differences (EPDs).
Research indicates birth weight is by far the most significant contributor to calving ease. In fact, researchers found that 60% of calving difficulty (dystocia) is due to calf birth weight.
With that in mind, it's easy to conclude that selecting low birth weight sires will reduce calving difficulty and increase the percentage of calf crop. However, a producer must also ask how placing selection pressure on low birth weights influences other production traits such as weaning weight and average daily gain.
For starters, the maternal/placenta interaction, maternal diet and environmental climate and temperature all have varying influences on birth weight and gestation length of calves.
There is no question that dead calves at birth don't weigh much at weaning time, and that birth weight has a major influence on subsequent calving ease. Research suggests, however, that selecting for birth weight EPDs alone can upend the economic fortunes of a cow/calf enterprise.
As cow/calf producers discovered long ago, that's because selecting for low birth weights is antagonistic to selecting for growth performance.
Emphasize Calving Ease
Consequently, emphasizing calving ease EPDs in selection rather than birth weight EPDs may offer greater dividends by allowing for the selection of calving ease and growth performance at the same time.
Table 1 illustrates genetic correlations from the American Simmental Association 2001 Spring Sire Summary. These genetic correlations — the genetic relationship between two different production traits — indicate how closely or how loosely traits are related to one another.
Correlations range from +1.0 to -1.0. The nearer a relationship is to ±1.0 the stronger the relationship is.
In the case of birth weight, correlations in the table underscore the fact that birth weight is highly correlated — but negatively correlated — to calving ease direct. At the same time, birth weight is highly correlated — and positively correlated — to weaning weight and yearling weight.
Obviously, this is just good cowboy logic. Although lighter calves at birth tend to be born easier, they are often lighter at weaning. Conversely, the heavier that calves are at birth, the more calving difficulty there tends to be. The heavier calves at birth, however, also tend to be the heaviest ones at weaning and yearling time. Thus, the genetic antagonism.
|Calving Ease Direct||Birth Weight||Weaning Weight||Yearling Weight||Calving Ease Maternal|
|Calving Ease (Direct)||1.000||— High||— Moderate||— Low||Moderate|
|Birth Wt.||-0.594||1.000||High||High||— Low|
|Calving Ease (Maternal)||0.303||— 0.141||0.039||0.093||1.000|
|Legend: •0.25 = low; 0.26-0.50 = moderate; •0.50 = high|
|*Source: American Simmental Association 2001 Spring Sire Summary|
However, looking at the table again, the genetic correlation between calving ease direct and weaning weight is not as negative as that between birth weight and weaning weight. So, placing more selection pressure on calving ease direct rather than birth weight is less antagonistic to growth traits.
Bottom line, this suggests that a producer can maintain an acceptable live calf crop percentage without sacrificing growth performance by focusing more on direct calving ease than birth weight when it comes to selecting for getting live calves on the ground. And, these easy calving, high growth sires that bend the rules of the low-birth weight, low-growth antagonism certainly exist.
As basic as this is, by considering this selection approach, cow/calf producers can boost their bottom lines and have their calving ease and weaning weights, too.
Tom Hook and his family run a fourth-generation, diversified seedstock and crop operation in its 100th year of continuous family agricultural production. Contact him at Hook Farms, 11333 180th St., Tracy, MN 56175; or call 507/629-4946; or e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.