Reaching across the aisle, or the farm gate, or the conference table to find a sensible middle ground will result in a lot more good than an extreme viewpoint on either side.
A founder of an extremist environmental group isn’t the typical agriculture conference’s agenda highlight. Nevertheless, earlier this month at the Minnesota Agri-Growth Council Conference in Minneapolis,Patrick Moore, a PhD who was once smack dab in the middle of the radical environmental crusade, captivated producers and agri-business leaders as he shared his sensible approach to environmentalism.
Moore’s story starts during the height of the tension surrounding the Cold War, Vietnam War and, as he says, “the threat of all-out nuclear war.” In the late 1960s, the ecology PhD student joined a small group of activists in planninga voyage across the North Pacific to protest U.S. hydrogen bomb testing in Alaska. Their success proved that a “ragtag bunch” could gain huge amounts of public attention and change the course of history. From there, Greenpeace was born. By the mid 1980s, his small group, whichhad its inception in a church basement, had grown into a powerful organization with offices around the world and attracting $100 million in donations annually.
At that point, Moore says he decided he neededa change.
“I had been against at least three or four things every day of my life for 15 years. I decided it was time to figure out what I was in favor of,” the former Greenpeace president explained. “There is no getting away from the fact that 7 billion people wake up every morning on this planet with real needs for food, energy and materials. I found that my Greenpeace, which had begun as a humanitarian organization trying to prevent all-out nuclear war, had drifted into a position where we described humans as the enemy of the earth.”
That was Moore'spreface to anexcellent discussion heled with producers and agribusiness experts during the Minneapolis meeting.Here are three of my top takeaways from that discussion:
While we might not all agree with everything Moore professes, I think we can agree that his approach tosensible environmentalism is a step in the right direction -- which is the point of Moore’s engagement and environmental efforts. The ex-Greenpeace activist believes we need to find a consensus on competing efforts, and work toward compromise for the greater good of the environment and mankind.
Compromise, however,is a little hard to come by these days, so perhapsthat's actually the bigger lesson in all of this. Reaching across the aisle, or the farm gate, or the conference table, to find a sensible middle ground will result in a lot more good than an extreme viewpoint on either side.
And that's a lesson that stretches far beyond the scope of environmentalism.
To learn more about Moore, read his book Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist.
You might also like: