AmericanCowman.com - Dedicated to America's family cattle operations.

Most Recent

Cow Calf Weekly

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter... It's FREE!

Online Exclusives

Effects of wintering stockers


         Subscribe in NewsGator Online   Subscribe in Bloglines  

Rate of gain during the winter stocker period impacts finishing performance and carcass quality, researchers from West Virginia, Virginia and South Carolina conclude.

Angus-crossbred steers were used in a three-year study to assess the effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on finishing and carcass performance. From December to April, steers were randomly allotted to three stocker growth rates: Low (0.23 kg/day or 0.5 lbs.), Medium (0.45 kg/day or 1 lb.) or High (0.68 kg/day or 1.5 lbs.).

After completion of the winter phase, steers were randomly allotted within each stocker treatment to a corn silage-concentrate or pasture-finishing system. Steers were finished to an equal-time endpoint, regardless of treatment. Upon completion of the finishing period, steers were slaughtered in two groups (half from pasture and half from feedlot cattle each time) and carcass data were collected.

Winter stocker treatment resulted in differences in final body weight, average daily gain (ADG) and ultrasound longissmus (LM) area between all treatments for that phase. Pasture-finished cattle had lower final body weight, ADG, hot carcass weight (HCW), LM area, fat thickness, kidney, pelvic, heart (KPH), dressing percent, USDA Yield Grade (YG) and Quality Grade (QG).

Winter stocker treatment influenced final body weight and HCW, with Low and Medium treatments being less than High. Steers with Low stocker gain had greater finishing ADG. Dressing percent was greater for High than Low, and USDA QG was greater for High than Low and Medium. Carcass LM area, fat thickness, KPH and YG were not influenced during winter rate of gain.

Cattle on Low treatment during winter exhibited compensatory gain during finishing, but were unable to catch the High treatment group regarding body weight or HCW. QG was greater for High treatment than Low or Medium.

Researchers concluded animal performance during the winter stocker period clearly impacts finishing performance, carcass quality and beef production in both pasture- and feedlot-finishing systems, when cattle were finished to an equal-time endpoint.
J.P.S. Neel, et al. 2007. Journal of Animal Science, 85:2012.


Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Get Copyright Clearance Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

Browse Back Issues

American Cowman

www.AmericanCowman.com

Latest Jobs

Marketplace Ads

  • Hubbard Feeds, Inc

    Give us a call at (800)535-2428 to see if we can benefit your operation.

  • Hubbard Feeds, Inc

    Download free tools, sign-up for newsletters, browse nutrition products.

  • Your ad Here!

    Advertise your business here! Find out how.

  • Ag Maps for sale

    Ag Maps for Sale!

  • Livestock Markets

    The Place To Source Your Cattle and Horses.

Resources

  • Western Art Prints
  • Beef Quality Summit
  • 2007 Fencing Guide
  • 2008 Feed Composition Tables
  • Cattlemen's Calendar
  • Biosecurity
  • 2009 Alliance Yellow Pages
  • Estate Planning
  • Calf Health
  • RFID Suppliers
  • State of the Industry
  • Free Product Info
  • National Stocker Survey
  • Lets talk ag logo
  • National Stocker Survey