Most Recent
advertisement
More Topics
Online Exclusives
- BEEF Daily Blog: NEW! Daily updates from editor Amanda Nolz
- Election 2008: Read our coverage and voice your opinions
- Natural Disaster Coverage: Hurricane Ike
- BEEFtv: Videos from around the industry
- The Briefing Room: BEEF Business Updates
- BEEF News Roundup: Industry news & blog feeds - Updated Daily!
- BEEF Cartoons: Need to brighten your day?
- South America Study Tour: Travelogue and photos
- The BEEF Mailbag: Share your Viewpoint!
Corn Prices Running Counter To Global Supply Outlook
So far, prospects of a near-record corn crop are impacting prices more than estimated reductions in world and domestic grain supplies.
According to Darrel Good, University of Illinois Extension economist, "The price structure changed over the past few weeks as the market worried about a late harvest and a harvest that could get stretched out due to a period of wet weather. There are also some who believe USDA's September production forecast overstates the potential size of the 2006 crop, pointing to an implied high average ear weight in that report and reports of lower-than-expected yields in some areas."
Additionally, Good explains, "Crop condition ratings (60% in good or excellent condition as of Sept. 17) don't point to a yield as high as the 154.7 bu. forecast by USDA, even though actual yields have exceeded yields projected by crop ratings for the past seven years. It is rare, but not unprecedented, for the production estimate in January after harvest to be below the September forecast following an increase in the forecast from August to September. Over the past 35 years, that scenario occurred three times (1973, 1974 and 1990). There were only eight years in total over the past 35 that the January corn production estimate was below the September forecast by a meaningful amount."
You can find Good's complete "Weekly Outlook" at: www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/marketing/weekly/pdf/092506.pdf
For the week ending Sept. 24, according to National Ag Statistics Service (NASS).
States with the worst pasture conditions -- at least 40% of the acreage rated poor or worse -- include: Alabama (60%); Arizona (52%); Arkansas (41%); California (77%); Kansas (43%); Mississippi (49%); Missouri (54%); Montana (44%); Nebraska (46%); Nevada (63%); North Dakota (58%); Oklahoma (63%); Oregon (54%); South Dakota (46%); Texas (69%); and Wyoming (66%).
States with the lushest pasture conditions -- at least 40% rated good or better -- include: Florida (75%); Illinois (57%); Indiana (71%); Iowa (66%); Kentucky (69%); Maine (85%); Michigan (49%); New Mexico (66%); New York (59%); North Carolina (60%); Ohio (66%); Pennsylvania (55%); South Carolina (50%); Utah (43%); Virginia (47%); Washington (46%); West Virginia (59%); and Wisconsin (57%).
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

























