Will FSIS Furlough Hold The Food System Hostage?

What is in this article?:

A beef industry already rocked by economic and environmental challenges could face another bump in the road late next week.

Vote in our BEEF Poll on the furlough here.

Cattlemen as political pawns

Scott George, NCBA president and a Cody, WY, beef producer, characterized Vilsack's announcement on an FSIS furlough as USDA using producers as pawns in its political wrangling with Congress. He’s right, of course. And the White House essentially backs up George’s contention in a fact sheet posted at whitehouse.gov, that is entitled “Examples of How the Sequester Would Impact Middle Class Families, Jobs and Economic Security.”

Describing how the furlough of federal inspectors “would impact middle-class families, jobsand economic security,” the fact sheet says, "These reductions could increase the number and severity of safety incidents, and the public could suffer more foodborne illness, such as the recent salmonella in peanut butter outbreak and the E. coli illnesses linked to organic spinach, as well as cost the food and agriculture sector millions of dollars in lost production volume."

Discuss this Article 6

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 22, 2013

This issue has been greatly overblown. The furloughs would be taken over the course of the year, most likely at one day per week with the inspectors staggering their days off. The packing plants already pay for inspectors overtime, of which they have a lot of. The packers would end up just paying overtime to those working so that they can continue processing.

mollycoddle
on Feb 22, 2013

I don't have any problem with the sequester. This govt can afford to cut a ton of worthless spending, USDA especially. About 80% of the USDA budget is food stamps, for crying out loud. What gets me is that the Obama administration is so hooked and committed to spending the hard-earned money of responsible Americans, that it is looking to make these sequester cuts hurt the normal person as much as possible. How in the hell can USDA cut a service that it is required by law to provide, and by cutting this service bottlenecks the entire food industry? This is pure purely politics, purely grandstanding and purely shameful. Thanks, Obama voters.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 22, 2013

Right on.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 22, 2013

Ditto. Hope all those that voted for Obama are happy with their choice!

Doug (not verified)
on Feb 22, 2013

I would like to see an article on us standing up against the government, refusing to be governed by the crisis of the day. The cuts are only cuts in the rate of growth of government spending, not actual cuts. If the sequester goes through federal spending will increase by 1.6 trillion (by 2021) if it doesn’t it will increase 1.7 trillion. The drastic cuts being proposed are only to subdue any resistance on our part.

Rex Peterson (not verified)
on Feb 23, 2013

The Budget Control Act of 1985 is referenced by the most recent budget control bills and is referenced in Mr. Vilsack's response to the American Meat Institute. The rules have not changed. Mr. Obama is certainly not as capable, caring and compasionate an executive as Mr. Clinton.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your BEEF Magazine ID
(optional)

BEEF Newsletter Sign Up

Search 2.5+ million listings