Most Recent
advertisement
Cow Calf Weekly
Genetics TIPS from American Cowman
More Topics
Online Exclusives
- BEEF Daily Blog: NEW! Daily updates from editor Amanda Nolz
- Election 2008: Read our coverage and voice your opinions
- Natural Disaster Coverage: Hurricane Ike
- BEEFtv: Videos from around the industry
- The Briefing Room: BEEF Business Updates
- BEEF News Roundup: Industry news & blog feeds - Updated Daily!
- BEEF Cartoons: Need to brighten your day?
- South America Study Tour: Travelogue and photos
- The BEEF Mailbag: Share your Viewpoint!
2009 Across-Breed EPD Table Released
Here’s the latest table of adjustment factors to be used to estimate across-breed (AB) expected progeny differences (AB-EPDs) for 18 breeds (Table 1).
AB adjustment factors have been calculated for growth traits and maternal milk since 1993. Adjustment factors for carcass traits have been calculated since 2008; to be included, breeds must have carcass data in the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) database and report their carcass EPDs on an actual carcass basis using an age-adjusted endpoint.
Using this table, bulls of different breeds can be compared on the same EPD scale by adding the appropriate adjustment factor to the EPDs produced in the most recent genetic evaluations for each of the 18 breeds. The AB-EPDs are most useful to commercial producers purchasing bulls of more than one breed to use in cross-breeding programs. For example, in terminal cross-breed systems, AB-EPDs can be used to identify bulls in different breeds with high growth potential or favorable carcass characteristics.
As an example, suppose a Gelbvieh bull has a weaning weight EPD of +42.0 lbs. and a Simmental bull has a weaning weight EPD of +24.0 lbs. The AB adjustment factors for weaning weight (Table 1) are 1.7 lbs. for Gelbvieh and 25.0 lbs. for Simmental. The AB-EPD is 42.0 lbs. + 1.7 lbs. = 43.7 lbs. for the Gelbvieh bull and 24.0 lbs. + 25.0 lbs. = 49.0 lbs. for the Simmental bull. The expected weaning weight difference when both are mated to cows of another breed (e.g., Angus) would be 43.7 lbs. – 49.0 lbs. = -5.3 lbs.
Most breed associations publish EPDs on an annual basis. These EPDs predict differences expected in performance of future progeny of two or more bulls within the same breed for traits including birth weight, weaning weight, yearling weight and maternal milking ability (as reflected in progeny weaning weights).
Normally, the EPDs of bulls from different breeds can’t be compared because most breed associations compute their EPDs in separate analyses and each breed has a different base point. The AB adjustment factors allow producers to compare the EPDs for animals from different breeds for these traits; these factors reflect both the current breed difference (for animals born in 2007) and differences in the breed base point. They should only be used with EPDs current as of July 2009 because of potential changes in EPD calculations from year to year.
It’s important to note that the table factors (Table 1) don’t represent a direct comparison among the different breeds because of base differences between the breeds. They should only be used to compare EPDs (AB-EPDs) of animals in different breeds. To reduce confusion, breed of sire means (i.e., when sires from two different breeds are mated to cows of a third, unrelated breed) between 2007 born animals under conditions at USMARC are presented in Table 2.
The adjustment factors in Table 1 were updated using EPDs from the most recent national cattle evaluations conducted by each of the 18 breed associations (current as of May 2009). The breed differences used to calculate the factors are based on comparisons of progeny of sires from each of these breeds in the Germplasm Evaluation Program at USMARC in Clay Center, NE. These analyses were conducted by USMARC geneticists Larry Kuehn (Larry.Kuehn@ars.usda.gov or 402-762-4352) and Mark Thallman (Mark.Thallman@ars.usda.gov or 402-762-4261).
| Breed | Birth Wt. | Weaning Wt. | Yearling Wt. | Maternal Milk | Marbling Score | Ribeye Area | Fat Thickness | |
| Angus | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 | |
| Hereford | 2.9 | -2.8 | -16.1 | -17.5 | -0.36 | -0.24 | -0.057 | |
| Red Angus | 2.9 | -5.4 | -4.4 | -3.0 | -0.01 | -0.21 | -0.045 | |
| Shorthorn | 6.1 | 19.9 | 52.8 | 23.1 | 0.06 | 0.12 | -0.133 | |
| South Devon | 4.5 | 6.9 | -1.4 | -6.5 | -0.32 | -0.39 | -0.131 | |
| Beefmaster | 7.7 | 44.2 | 44.0 | 2.6 | ||||
| Brahman | 11.2 | 36.3 | 2.2 | 29.0 | ||||
| Brangus | 4.7 | 21.9 | 19.9 | 2.4 | ||||
| Santa Gertrudis | 8.1 | 17.1 | ||||||
| Braunvieh | 7.5 | 21.4 | 12.8 | 30.6 | -0.26 | 0.78 | -0.149 | |
| Charolais | 9.7 | 38.2 | 51.9 | 5.6 | -0.50 | 0.63 | -0.244 | |
| Chiangus | 4.1 | -19.6 | ||||||
| Gelbvieh | 4.5 | 1.7 | -12.6 | 9.9 | ||||
| Limousin | 4.2 | -3.4 | -28.6 | -14.2 | -0.80 | 0.93 | ||
| Maine-Anjou | 5.5 | -10.7 | -22.8 | -0.8 | -0.92 | 1.07 | -0.197 | |
| Salers | 3.4 | 22.7 | 52.3 | 13.1 | -0.11 | 0.78 | -0.224 | |
| Simmental | 5.5 | 25.0 | 22.4 | 13.7 | -0.60 | 0.92 | -0.193 | |
| Tarentaise | 2.5 | 29.7 | 17.9 | 22.2 | ||||
| Breed | Birth Wt. | Weaning Wt. | Yearling Wt. | Maternal Milk | Marbling Score | Ribeye Area | Fat Thickness | |
| Angus | 84.7 | 525.6 | 907.8 | 516.7 | 5.84 | 12.14 | 0.549 | |
| Hereford | 88.9 | 520.3 | 879.7 | 494.6 | 5.21 | 11.92 | 0.483 | |
| Red Angus | 85.7 | 507.9 | 878.3 | 509.2 | 5.58 | 11.83 | 0.492 | |
| Shorthorn | 90.8 | 516.3 | 904.0 | 521.8 | 5.59 | 12.10 | 0.405 | |
| South Devon | 89.6 | 528.7 | 901.8 | 511.0 | 5.47 | 12.49 | 0.417 | |
| Beefmaster | 90.7 | 533.7 | 884.3 | 500.8 | ||||
| Brahman | 95.5 | 532.0 | 852.1 | 531.0 | ||||
| Brangus | 87.8 | 525.9 | 887.8 | 505.8 | ||||
| Santa Gertrudis | 91.1 | 503.3 | ||||||
| Braunvieh | 89.8 | 504.4 | 842.1 | 527.0 | 5.28 | 12.79 | 0.386 | |
| Charolais | 92.8 | 543.6 | 920.9 | 508.2 | 5.06 | 12.79 | 0.295 | |
| Chiangus | 87.8 | 506.7 | ||||||
| Gelbvieh | 88.3 | 524.8 | 889.2 | 524.1 | ||||
| Limousin | 88.4 | 521.3 | 878.3 | 503.3 | 4.73 | 13.33 | ||
| Maine-Anjou | 89.9 | 511.5 | 884.1 | 515.4 | 4.83 | 13.22 | 0.341 | |
| Salers | 86.8 | 522.6 | 909.6 | 517.7 | 5.42 | 12.79 | 0.314 | |
| Simmental | 89.3 | 539.5 | 907.7 | 514.0 | 5.07 | 12.99 | 0.355 | |
| Tarentaise | 86.5 | 515.8 | 856.7 | 519.3 | ||||
-- Larry Kuehn and Mark Thallman, USMARC
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus




























