Technology and an aggressive, transparent discovery process mean Angus breeders and users of Angus genetics can manage Arthrogryposis Multiplex (AM) without sacrificing genetics.
Listening to the rhetoric surrounding the September announcement that Arthrogryposis Multiplex (AM) — a lethal genetic defect also known as Curly Calf — had been discovered in Angus cattle and was likely tied to one of its most used sires, you'd have thought the end of the world was at hand.
“It created a hysteria I'd never seen before among some seedstock producers,” says Mark Gardiner of Gardiner Angus Ranch (GAR), Ashland, KS. Evidence indicates the genetic disorder stems from a bull the Gardiners bred and raised named GAR Precision 1680; actually it goes back to that bull's maternal grandsire 9J9.
According to Precision 1680's performance record from the American Angus Association (AAA), nearly 10,000 direct sons and daughters are part of the breed's genetic evaluation. Multiply that by a likely factor of 30 or 40 and you start to grasp the number of descendents this bull has spawned within the breed.
Precision 1680 was one of the first Angus sires to bend the genetic curve, providing low birth weight but superior weaning and yearling growth. Born in 1990 and deceased for a decade, his progeny continue to be favorites of seedstock and commercial producers. He's stacked five and six deep in some pedigrees.
Every breed, every species, every individual contains recessive genes. Those genes are seldom expressed, however, and thus rarely known about, except for the most abominable luck.
In the case of Precision 1680, it was inadvertent propagation. His genes were being multiplied and magnified because of his genetic merit; no one knew he also carried the recessive gene for AM. In other words, you're not likely to uncover problems in bulls used for a season or two and then discarded by the industry.
The initial emotional reaction was understandable, stoked by past episodes with genetic recessive disorders like Snorter Dwarfism, which decimated entire herds and lines of Angus and Hereford cattle in the 1960s, or Mule Foot in the late 1970s. In the last two decades, no fewer than six of the most heavily utilized breeds have had to contend with genetic recessive disorders.
In those days, the only way to determine if an animal possessed the recessive gene in question was to line-breed him and try to create problems. With the DNA test for AM, producers can identify noncarriers within the affected line of cattle and use them without fear of propagating the recessive gene.
DNA test near completion
In March 2007, AAA received notice of a handful of calves born dead with bent and twisted spines, the phenotypic expression of AM. Necropsies and some of the calves were sent, at AAA's request, to David Steffen, a University of Nebraska DVM and a longtime consultant to AAA. He was unable to determine the cause as environmental, genetic or due to viral infection.
In April 2008, another nine calves with a similar condition were reported. Based on Steffen's recommendation and growing belief the abnormality was genetic, AAA alerted members on Sept. 5 and requested they report any problems consistent with AM. By Sept. 15, AAA received verbal and written reports on another 48 calves.
AAA then issued notice that the cause was likely due to a lethal genetic defect, via a simple mode of inheritance, and likely stemmed from Precision 1680. Jonathan Beever, University of Illinois molecular geneticist, was also working with AAA and Steffen and has shouldered developing a DNA test to identify AM carriers.
The Gardiners first encountered AM in 1991. That was a potential diagnosis provided by renowned Kansas State University geneticist Horst Leipold, when the Gardiners brought a stillborn calf to him that had a bent and twisted spine.
Since then, the Gardiners have bred and raised about 27,000 calves. Eleven were stillborn and anatomically abnormal; six had no Precision in their pedigrees. The veterinarians and researchers consulted determined the likely cause was environmental or disease-related.
It wasn't until August 2008 that Beever told the Gardiners he believed the cause was AM and likely stemmed from Precision. The Gardiners quickly provided semen and DNA on Precision descendents. More analysis was done.
By Nov. 3, AAA provided members a list of AI sires and their AM genotypes. Beever also enlisted the help of bull studs to help validate the DNA test via the sires they represent. They understandably wanted to know as much as possible as soon as possible to inform their customers.
All told, 761 Angus sires were tested; 60 bulls turned up carriers, all directly related to Precision 1680 and 9J9. That 8% says nothing about the actual gene frequency within the breed. Anecdotally, however, it suggests the gene isn't nearly as pervasive as some may have feared.
By Nov. 3, confidence was running high that a commercial test would be available within 45 days.
“With DNA technology, we've gone from not having a test two months ago, to having the tool we need to manage this deleterious gene,” says Doug Frank, ABS global beef product manager.
Managing with Curly Calf
The simple mode of inheritance associated with AM thus far, and the test for it, mean the condition is easily managed, especially for commercial users.
Many are familiar with coat color in Angus as an example of how the simple mode of genetic inheritance works. Red is recessive and black is dominant. If a calf receives the gene for black from one or both parents, its coat color will be black. In order for the animal to be red, it must inherit the recessive gene (red), from both parents.
So it appears to be with AM: the animal must receive the recessive AM gene from both parents to be afflicted, though inheriting the recessive gene from one parent makes the calf an AM carrier (see “Curly Calf genetics”).
“If I'm a commercial producer and I haven't line-bred, my risk is essentially zero,” Gardiner says. In other words, the odds of mating a carrier bull to cows that are also carriers is extremely low. For commercial producers mating Angus bulls to cows of another breed, or vice versa, there is no risk, even if the Angus being used is a carrier.
For seedstock producers, it's a matter of knowing the AM status of their genetics and those they intend to use. It's also a matter of understanding AAA preliminary guidelines regarding registration of AM carriers and noncarriers.
Briefly, AAA won't suspend or revoke registrations of currently registered cattle based on their AM status. Calves born out of currently registered Angus cattle that are AM carriers must be tested to be eligible for registration; registration certificates will reflect their AM status.
Beginning Jan. 1, all calves born from currently registered Angus cattle that are AM carriers must be tested; only AM-free calves from those matings will be eligible for registration. AI-sired calves won't be eligible for registration if conceived more than 60 days after an AI sire is announced to be an AM carrier.
“ABS' desired policy is full testing, full disclosure and let the market decide. We certainly would not promote the use of carrier bulls but would encourage breeders to look at the total genetic merit of carrier bulls and females and how they fit into their breeding program,” Frank says, explaining how the industry has approached other breeds that have carried genetic recessives.
“After all, control is black and white and it's much easier using today's DNA technology to manage a simple recessive to have zero negative economic effect than it is to avoid the negative economic impact of other traits like reduced performance, excessive birth weight or poor feet and legs,” Frank says.
A new model
In an industry often driven as much by emotion as market logic, the Gardiners' most recent sale serves as a refreshing example of the common sense being leveled at AM and the line of cattle it apparently stems from. The Gardiners' fall bull sale was Sept. 29, when AM emotion was running hot. They sold 214, 18-month-old bulls for an average of $4,620 — $500 more than the previous year.
The Gardiners did provide the carrier probability of each bull. But the success likely had more to do with the relationship they've developed with customers and their reputation for standing behind their cattle.
Such commonsense buying also has plenty to do with the confidence spawned by the rapid and transparent response of AAA, its members and the Gardiners to attacking the problem.
In fact, the response of the breeder, the breed and science to AM provides a new model for the industry to use in addressing future genetic recessive issues.