Ethanol Study Shows Need To Reform RFS Mandate

What is in this article?:

An inflexible Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) has led to volatility in corn prices and a smaller livestock industry, but hasn’t reduced America’s dependence on foreign oil, study shows.

Noting that the chances for harvesting a bumper corn crop diminish with each passing day, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) took aim at an issue that is causing growing concern not just in livestock circles, but with consumers as well.

During a briefing for congressional staffers this week, Goodlatte said that news reports have begun to raise the specter that a reduced corn crop will hit consumers’ pocketbooks hard by driving up food prices. “Unfortunately, government policies are only exacerbating this dire situation. Now more than ever, it is important for us all to have a serious conversation about the federal government’s role in supporting ethanol.”

According to several studies, Goodlatte’s concern about the food vs. fuel debate are well-founded. During this week’s briefing, Tom Elam, president of FarmEcon, LLC, Carmel, IN, released the results of his study on the effects off the RFS on fuel and food prices.

According to Elam’s study:

  • Current ethanol policy has increased and destabilized corn and related commodity prices to the detriment of both food and fuel producers. Corn price volatility has more than doubled since 2007.
  • Following the late 2007 increase in the RFS, food price inflation relative to all other goods and services accelerated sharply to twice its 2005-2007 rate.
  • Post-2007 higher rates of food price inflation are associated with sharp increases in corn, soybean and wheat prices.
  • On an energy-equivalent basis, ethanol has never been priced competitively with gasoline.
  • Ethanol production costs and prices have ruled out U.S. ethanol use at levels higher than E 10. As a result, the U.S. exported 1.2 billion gals. of ethanol in 2011.
  • Due to its higher energy cost and negative effect on fuel mileage, ethanol adds to the overall cost of motor fuels. In 2011, the higher cost of ethanol energy compared with gasoline added approximately $14.5 billion, or about 10¢/gal., to the cost of U.S. gasoline consumption.

Using four different measures of gasoline prices and oil refiner margins, from 2000 through 2011, there was no statistically significant effect of increase ethanol production on gasoline prices or oil refiner margins.

Noting that his conclusions regarding ethanol’s effects on gasoline were very similar to a study conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of California-Davis, Elam told the staffers that U.S. oil refiners are refining as much or more motor fuel now than they were in 2007.

Thus, blending ethanol into the gasoline supply has not displaced any foreign oil imports. “Basically, all ethanol has done is displace gasoline from the domestic market and moved that gasoline over to the export market,” Elam says.

Discuss this Article 4

Bobby Fontaine (not verified)
on Jul 21, 2012

the article at the link below is a must read before any serious discussion on ethanol

http://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2012/05/04/op-ed-counterpoint-t...

Ken (not verified)
on Jul 26, 2012

Anyone with a third grade education could have told you that converting food to fuel is a stupid idea !!!!!!!!!

shaun evertson (not verified)
on Jul 26, 2012

The RFS doesn't need to be reformed, it needs to be eliminated. It was a hare-brained scheme from the start. It promised to clean the environment, reduce dependency on foreign oil, and support the American Farmer. Laudable goals, but it hasn't worked out. It's done one of three -- support the American Farmer -- The American corn Farmer -- but only by creating a fictional demand via standards and subsidies, and at the expense of non-corn growing ag producers, gasoline consumers, food consumers and the taxpayer. I'd argue that the benefits to the corn farmer are transient at best and could have the terrible unintended consequence of alienating consumers, who are slowly but surely waking up to the realities of high food prices and low fuel mileage. Isn't it time to just cut the cord, to admit that even though we had the best of intentions we made a big mistake? Hasn't history proved time and again that utopian fantasy cannot exist in the face of reality?

JRGidaho
on Jul 26, 2012

There has never been any research, other than that supported by the corn and ethanol industries, that has shown any net positive energy gain from ethanol blending. Unbiased analyses have repeatedly shown grain-based ethanol to be a negative energy source. The severe negative externalities of ethanol on society as a whole are becoming increasingly evident through increased food costs, further soil degradation, and increasing government intervention in what should be free markets.
Yes, it is time (actually way past time) to eliminate the entire ethanol component of the RFS program (if not the entire program).

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your BEEF Magazine ID
(optional)

BEEF Newsletter Sign Up

Search 2.5+ million listings