Anyone who’s followed the efforts of the national beef checkoff understands what a tremendous benefit it’s been to the industry. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) response to BSE and the muscle-profiling

Troy Marshall 2, BEEF Contributing Editor

November 5, 2010

2 Min Read
Checkoff Structure Needs Tweaking

Anyone who’s followed the efforts of the national beef checkoff understands what a tremendous benefit it’s been to the industry. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) response to BSE and the muscle-profiling study are two examples of successes that returned the industry millions of dollars. Plus, there’s the advertising, marketing, educational and co-promotional programs have helped turn around the nutrition discussion.

Perhaps our greatest return, however, has been on the research, food safety and issues-management side of the equation. Yet again, our state beef council efforts might be the best story in helping to build beef demand. In fact, the return-on-investment studies indicate that the only negative thing about our investment in the checkoff is that inflation has eaten away at its effectiveness, leaving us hugely underfunded.

The merger that created an organization with the tools to build beef demand was a terrific idea, and the results have been significant. Unfortunately, recent events with the politicizing of the Cattlemen’s Beef Board also have made it abundantly clear that the system is broken.

The one thing we’ve learned is that while NCBA is the only organization with the capabilities to perform most of these functions, it is counterproductive to see the checkoff being used as a political football. Secondly, we’ve learned that the checkoff is not a producer program, it’s a USDA program. The implications of that are becoming more and more obvious and severely limit the program’s effectiveness.

Not only does every word uttered by checkoff personnel have to be first vetted by USDA, but USDA has put so many restrictions on the program that it’s questionable if it could be called promotion/marketing. Despite the political posturing, the firewall between policy and promotion dollars has been maintained extremely well.

Yet, the reality is that when many of the issues affecting beef demand are political in nature or involve issue management, the separation is almost impossible to maintain. Animal welfare, environmental concerns, food safety and even nutrition have political ramifications and drivers.

The system is broken and the industry can’t rely on a government-controlled program to help us build beef demand and effectively deal with the issues that have the potential to negatively impact demand. Our industry structure has become outdated and needs fixing.

Certainly, the freeloader principle made a mandatory government-administered program attractive. At this point, if we as an industry aren’t willing to invest in beef demand ourselves, we have significant issues. It’s probably time to realize that those paying the dues need to have more of a say in the program. Whether that means a voluntary checkoff program, or simply modifications to the program, the current structure is appearing to be inadequate for building beef demand into the future.
-- Troy Marshall

About the Author(s)

Troy Marshall 2

BEEF Contributing Editor

Troy Marshall is a multi-generational rancher who grew up in Wheatland, WY, and obtained an Equine Science/Animal Science degree from Colorado State University where he competed on both the livestock and World Champion Horse Judging teams. Following college, he worked as a market analyst for Cattle-Fax covering different regions of the country. Troy also worked as director of commercial marketing for two breed associations; these positions were some of the first to provide direct links tying breed associations to the commercial cow-calf industry.

A visionary with a great grasp for all segments of the industry, Troy is a regular opinion contributor to BEEF Cow-Calf Weekly. His columns are widely reprinted and provide in-depth reporting and commentary from the perspective of a producer who truly understands the economics and challenges of the different industry segments. He is also a partner/owner in Allied Genetic Resources, a company created to change the definition of customer service provided by the seedstock industry. Troy and his wife Lorna have three children. 

Subscribe to Our Newsletters
BEEF Magazine is the source for beef production, management and market news.

You May Also Like