My View From The Country

Cattle Industry Takes Notice Of Court Ruling On Quarter Horse Cloning

The question is whether breed associations have the right to make and enforce rules supported by the majority of its members.

An Amarillo court ruled against the American Quarter Horse Association (AQHA) this week in a lawsuit brought by horse owners wishing to register their cloned offspring. At first glance, the question of whether or not a horse breed association would be forced to register certain animals would seem to have little impact on the cattle industry, but the ruling is likely causing executives in a lot of cattle breed associations some sleepless nights.

It’s irrelevant whether AQHA should register cloned animals or not; the question is whether breed associations have the right to make and enforce rules supported by the majority of its members. AQHA promised to appeal the decision but, if upheld, it could be argued that a whole host of similar rules might not withstand a legal challenge. Restricting the registration of animals that carry certain genetic defects is one such example. It could be argued that even requiring a breeding certificate could be challenged in court.

I could come up with a page of breed association policies restricting one’s ability to market and profit from their animals that may or not be based on sound principles. However, it’s always been understood that a breed association, if it follows its own policies and rules, had the right to make such rules. This ruling essentially states that AQHA doesn’t have the right to make its own rules, even if the policy was created according to its own bylaws.

Cattle breed associations have been devastated by lawsuits in the past, but have largely been spared from a lot of litigation because it was understood that those associations had the right to make and enforce their own policies. One of the sacrosanct rights of associations has been that they could make as boneheaded and stupid policy decisions as the membership wanted. Now, it appears the courts may have decided that they have the right to intervene and correct those policies.

 

You might also like:

Panera Bread Uses Fear To Sell Chicken Sandwiches #PluckEZChicken

Caption This Custom Painting To Win

Barnyard Brawn: 13 New Tractors For Your Ranch

4 Things Anti-Beef Pundits Are Saying About You

What's Land Worth? Broker Provides Answers

Discuss this Blog Entry 1

on Aug 2, 2013

Your article leaves me wondering.... what is your position? I believe that an association is just that, an association and as such the elected officals have the right to make they bylaws that serve the association's members interests. The courts should not intervene. And by the way, I do not think cloned horses should be registered or allowed to compete in association events.

Post new comment
or to use your BEEF Magazine ID
What's My View From The Country?

As a fulltime rancher, opinion contributor Troy Marshall brings a unique perspective on how consumer and political trends affect livestock production.

Contributors

Troy Marshall

Troy Marshall is a multi-generational rancher who grew up in Wheatland, WY, and obtained an Equine Science/Animal Science degree from Colorado State University where he competed on both the livestock...

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×