Most Recent
advertisement
Cow Calf Weekly
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter... It's FREE!
More Topics
Online Exclusives
- BEEF Daily Blog: NEW! Daily updates from editor Amanda Nolz
- Election 2008: Read our coverage and voice your opinions
- Natural Disaster Coverage: Hurricane Ike
- BEEFtv: Videos from around the industry
- The Briefing Room: BEEF Business Updates
- BEEF News Roundup: Industry news & blog feeds - Updated Daily!
- BEEF Cartoons: Need to brighten your day?
- South America Study Tour: Travelogue and photos
- The BEEF Mailbag: Share your Viewpoint!
Government Land-Grab Moves Forward
The nation took a step closer to the largest federal land grab in the nation’s history last week, according to the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA).
That’s thanks to passage of the Clean Water Restoration Act (CWRA) by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
In basic terms the CRWA (S. 787) would grant the federal government authority of all water – both navigable, which it now presides over, as well as non-navigable.
Without defining and confining federal authority to navigable waters, an NCBA spokesman said, “…the CWRA would expand federal regulatory control to unprecedented levels – essentially putting stock tanks, drainage ditches, any puddle or water feature found on family farms and ranches – potentially even ground water – under the regulatory strong-arm of the federal government.”
Though the bill was amended last week, NCBA officials explain, “The amendment is a smoke screen that allegedly takes care of agricultural concerns by exempting prior-converted croplands from federal jurisdiction. Cattle are generally not grazed on prior-converted croplands, so this amendment does nothing to mitigate the potential damage to livestock production from this legislation. The amendment is a diversion from the real issue, which is the removal of the word ‘navigable’ from the definition of waters.”
NCBA and Public Lands Council oppose the legislation because it obviously infringes on private property rights, but also because it limits the state partnerships and flexibility that have made the current Clean Water Act successful.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.
Acceptable Use Policy blog comments powered by Disqus






























